Summary of Volume 2, November 15, 2010

Purchase this Edition.

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW    5

ADMINISTRATIVE, RULE-MAKING AND ADJUDICATORY FUNCTIONS    5
Exercise of these tri-functions does not violate the Constitution    5

AUTHORITY OF THE PRESIDENT TO ALLOW ASSIGNMENT    5
Allowing PNCC to assign its franchise or usufruct not unconstitutional    5

AUTHORIZATION TO COLLECT INITIAL TOLL RATES    6
No public hearing required    6

AUTHORIZING AN ENTITY TO OPERATE A TOLL FACILITY    6
Includes power to amend or modify said authorization    6

CANCELLATION OF CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION    7
May be ordered by IPO even if no cancellation case filed    7

CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE IN STOAS    7
Does not violate constitutional right to information    7

DATA SUPPLIED BY EXPERTS TO FIX TOLL RATES    7
Banking on such data practical and inevitable    7

DECLARATION OF ACTUAL USE (DAU)    8
Not conclusive of the first use of a mark    8

DELEGATED POWER TO OPERATE A TOLL FACILITY    8
Congress may allow administrative body to grant the same to qualified persons    8

DESCRIPTION OF TRADER IN SALES INVOICE    9
Does not preclude that he could be a manufacturer    9

EFFECT OF EXPIRATION OF PNCC’S LEGISLATIVE FRANCHISE    9
Its toll assets and facilities automatically became government property    9

END OF LEGISLATIVE FRANCHISE TO OPERATE TOLL FACILITIES    10
Not effective if TRB gives the franchisee a new authorization    10

EVIDENCE IN INTER PARTIES PROCEEDINGS    10
No formal offer of evidence required    10

FACTUAL FINDINGS OF ADMINISTATIVE BODIES    11
Exception to rule that factual findings enjoy high respect    11

IPO NOT BOUND BY TECHNICAL RULES    11
Effect of evidence attached to verified petition    11

MODIFICATION OF PNCC STOAS    11
TRB may alter STOA terms subject to some qualification    11

PAYMENT OF UNEARNED TOLL REVENUES    12
Any obligation by TRB to pay is unconstitutional    12

PERIODIC ADJUSTMENT OF TOLL RATES    13
Pubic hearing is condition precedent    13

PNCC’S AUTHORITY TO ACT AS INTERIM OPERATOR OF SLEX    13
TRB may grant authority to operate toll facility in an interim capacity    13

PNCC’S NEW AUTHORITY IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE FRANCHISE    14
TRB is given the power to grant new authorization to PNCC    14

PNCC’S SHARE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE FRANCHISE    14
It holds its share in trust in favor of the Government    14

POWER OF LENDERS TO EXTEND THEIR CONCESSION    14
If it exceeds 50 years, it is violative of the Constitution    14

POWER OF TOLL REGULATORY BOARD    15
Grant of authority to construct and operate toll facility    15

PRIOR AND CONTINUOUS USE OF A MARK    15
Necessary to establish ownership of mark    15

STOA FOR EXTENSION OF SLEX    16
No public hearing required being in the initial toll rates    16

STOAS ENTRED BY TRB WITH PNCC    16
Authorizes PNCC to continue construction toll facilities    16

SUBSTITUTED ENTITY TO OPERATE TOLL FACILITY    17
Lenders’ authority to appoint substitute entity in case of default valid    17

TECHNICAL RULES OF PROCEDURE    17
No binding effect on administrative bodies    17

TOLL PROJECTS UNDERTAKN BY PNCC    17
No public bidding is required    17

TOLL RATES MUST BE FAIR AND REASONABLE    18
Reasonableness of toll rate increase must be shown by operators    18

TRANSFER OF PNCC’S PROPERTIES TO GOVERNMENT    18
Does not mean PNCC cannot use them in exercising its new franchise    18

TRB IS THE GRANTOR REFERRED TO IN STOAS    19
But only as representative of the Government    19

TRB’S CONTRACT-MAKING POWER    19
Courts cannot look into the wisdom of its exercise    19

TRB’S STATUS UNDER THE LAW IS PECULIARLY UNIQUE    20
No usurpation of legislative power to grant franchise    20

CIVIL LAW    20

ABSOLUTE NULLITY OF VOID MARRIAGES    20
Declared if solemnized during effectivity of Family Code    20

ADDED COSTS IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT    20
Must be approved in writing by party obliged    20

COMPROMISE AGREEMENT    21
In effect, it is the determination of the court    21

CONDITIONS FOR ESTOPPEL IN PAIS    21
Supplies deficiency in law but not supplant it    21

CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES    22
Considered the law between them    22

ESTOPPEL IN PAIS    22
Not applicable even if some change orders were paid    22

EXEMPLARY DAMAGES AND ATTORNEY’S FEES    22
Act in bad faith and a party is compelled to litigate due to such bad faith    22

LIABILITY TO REPAIR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS    23
Refers to the 12-month guarantee after final acceptance    23

PROGRESS BILLINGS NOT PAID    23
Does not affect net amount due    23

SET-OFF OF PARTIES’ CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY    23
Fair and reasonable but subject to legal interest    23

CIVIL PROCEDURE    24

RIGHT OF PARTY TO APPEAL    24
Essential part of judicial system    24

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW    24

ALLEGATION OF INFRINGEMENT OF CONSTITUTION    24
Constitutes actual controversy ripe for judicial intervention    24

ISSUES OF TRANSCENDENTAL IMPORTANCE    25
Locus standi rule may be relaxed    25

LOCUS STANDI TO CHALLENGE AN ACT    26
Personal and substantial interest in the case must be shown    26

RIPENESS OF ACTUAL CASE OR CONTROVERSY    26
Challenged act has direct adverse effect on the challenger    26

CRIMINAL LAW    27

ALIBI DEFENSE IN ILLEGAL DRUG SALE    27
Must be shown by convincing evidence    27

BAPTISMAL CERTIFICATE IN STATUTORY RAPE    27
Evidentiary value in prosecution    27

CHAIN OF CUSTODY OF ILLEGAL DRUGS    27
Evidentiary value deemed preserved    27

COMMON-LAW RELATIONSHIP    28
Must be alleged in the information    28

CRIME OF RAPE WITH HOMICIDE    28
The three elements must concur    28

DAMAGES IN RAPE WITH HOMICIDE    28
Amount varies according to kind of damage    28

DANGEROUS DRUGS    29
Delayed marking does not make arrest illegal    29

ELEMENTS OF BUY-BUST OPERATION    29
Proper when all elements are present    29

ELEMENTS OF SALE OF ILLEGAL DRUGS    29
The two elements must concur    29

ELEMENTS OF STATUTORY RAPE    30
The two elements must concur    30

PENALTY FOR ILLEGAL DRUG SALE    30
Life imprisonment and P500,000 to P10,000,000 fine    30

PENALTY FOR RAPE WITH HOMICIDE    30
Reclusion perpetua is penalty    30

PLACING FACILITIES FOR COMMISSION OF CRIME    30
No defense to prosecution in illegal drug sale    30

PROCEDURAL LAPSES IN CUSTODY OF DRUGS    31
Does not make arrest illegal and seized drugs inadmissible    31

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RAPIST AND VICTIM’S MOTHER    31
There must be a valid marriage    31

SEARCH AS INCIDENT TO LAWFUL ARREST    32
Does not a search and seizure warrant    32

SIMPLE CRIMES OF RAPE CRIME    32
Penalty is reclusion perpetua    32

TOUCHING OF GENITALIA BY PENIS    32
Sufficient to prove crime of rape    32

WARRANTLESS ARREST IN ILLEGAL DRUG TRADE    33
Justified in buy-bust operation    33

FORESHORE LAW    33

FORESHORE LAND    33
Condition for treating a land as such    33

LAW ON EVIDENCE    34
“OBJECTIVE TEST” IN BUY-BUST OPERATION    34
Details of the buy-bust operation must be shown    34

BUY-BUST OPERATIUON    34
A valid form of entrapment    34

CREDIBILITY OF CHILD –VICTIM’S TESTIMONY    34
Given full weight, respect and credence    34

EFFECT OF AFFIDAVIT OF DESISTANCE    35
Will not justify dismissal if done after institution of action    35

ELEMENTS OF ILLEGAL DRUG SALE    35
When shown, prosecution passes the “objective” test    35

FACTUAL FINDINGS AFFIRMED BY CA    36
Binding effect on Supreme Court    36

FACTUAL FINDINGS OF TRIAL COURTS    36
Evidentiary value in appeals    36

REGULARITY IN THE PERFORMANCE OF DUTY    36
Rebuttal must be by convincing evidence    36

WARRANTS NOT NEEDED IN BUY-BUST OPERATION    37
A circumstance of warrantless arrests    37

PROCEDURAL OR REMEDIAL LAW    37

AS A RULE, SC DOES NOT REVIEW FINDINGS OF FACTS    37
But may review questions of facts in certain cases    37

ISSUES RAISED ONLY IN RECONSIDERATION MOTIONS    37
SC will not rule on them on appeals    37

SC NOT A TRIER OF FACTS    38
Exception    38

STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION    38

CARDINAL RULE IN STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION    38
No room for interpretation if the language on marriage is clear    38

DOUBTS RESOLVE IN FAVOR OF CONSTITUTIONALITY    39
Actions taken under such law are valid    39

Purchase this Edition.

This entry was posted in Case Law, Doctrinal Pronouncement, Jurisprudence, Law of Precedence and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>